Sexual abuse

The Left’s Slow Sexualization of America – ‘Page One’

Quote Posted on Updated on

You would think that after some sixty years and more of the leftist liberals hardened efforts to try and destroy this nation that anyone, not a liberal, would by now see a way to stop it from happening. Instead, we, unfortunately, continue to allow a steady working of it on a daily basis for the removal of morality and integrity from our society for a purpose that today seems to wander away from the center of all liberal ideology.

What do liberals want? They want to reform the constitutional standards this nation was founded upon. Why? Because at the root of it stands a truth in the way of immoral and devious mannerisms so often propagated, yet personally denied and blamed on all who oppose them. The focused theme today by liberals is sexual deviancy at any cost clearly intends to make sexual deviates out of this whole nation if possible. And will do so with an exclusion of themselves claiming to be of a higher moral standard than the ones they are forcing us to take up.

It appears the foundational precepts for being a liberal is not only that one must be willing to make stupidity a sanctioned knowledge, but also be to able lie, and deceive, without any consciousness of hypocrisy. Since these attributes work so well to despair any responsibility while foaming at the mouth with narratives evilly promoting actions of sexual perversity. The left’s embrace of transgenderism, homosexuality, and every manner of sexual deviancy there is is a facade and the most progressive theme of the day for societal transformation well beyond their own liberal purpose. Seen in the fact they don’t speak out against any of it, but instead promote homophobia, racism, sexism, and misogynistic narratives against those who do.

Liberalism in its beginning wasn’t favored around promoting deviant sexual activity, it was fashioned by theorizing political power as the best way to indoctrinate a nation into accepting socialist governmental oversight as the norm. Based on a false premise that the nation’s history is subjugated with evil, and is ill-fated in its ability to substantially care for its citizens. And by a continuous cloying promotion of socialism presented as the only way for a society to prevent harm to someone by others has given way to the civil rights activist over the last 50 years or more.

But let’s go back to this sexual theme that is running through the left’s core message today. It is one that is in direct contrast to their reformist narratives that emboldens them as the only ones who care for the people. So, how do you glean out let me help you to a better life, from, being forced to accept and adopt these deviously sexual perversions that will render you a sexual pervert? This transgenderism deal is a perfect example of their hypocrisy in this, seen in the fact they are not going to be one themselves but favor forcing you and me to accept it as the norm of today. And by the way, why is it so important that this sexual perversity is amassed upon us in the first place what is their end goal here?

It could be that they are just as scripture says about those who work out of the daily darkness of evil? John 3:19-2119 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God. It seems they may have figured out the best way to hide their own evil deeds is to create as much of it as you can, so that it all blends in and becomes unseen among everyone else s. Or could it be that they are so indebted to a course of the hatefulness of anyone who desires to stay away from it that it cannot be detoured, so every aspect of immorality must be formed out of it to satisfy that hate?

Though I poke the liberal causes all the time I have friends on the left that don’t see this sexual perversity thing as necessary to the core foundation of liberalism. In fact, it is in conflict to it because for them to hold the bar with the “Me Too Movement” amid the white privilege narratives they spark each day on the media means the sexual abuse and unending promiscuity of those on the left are totally unacceptable. This flies in the face of this sexualization movement, but hold on we must remember hypocrisy is at work here, so for those whose deeds are evil, the truth is notwithstanding thus they are safe.

Today we have Planned Parenthood working alongside other reform organizations entering our public schools and educating our young children on how to be sexually promiscuous without conviction. Teaching those as young as 7 such things as anal sex, masochistic sex, rimming, sexual sadism, and other techniques of sexual disorders at a time when most of these kids haven’t learned the difference between anxiety and aroused senses. The real danger America faces as a result of this darkness is that since we are already accepting of it and the people who daily are doled in front of a TV camera telling us that all of this is OK, they will escape any righteous resolve.

So, if you haven’t been sexualized yet hang on it gets worse from here because these liberal leftist indigents are diligently at work ramping up even greater sexual publicizing for the future that once revealed will make this present level of perverting America look like abstinence.

Jesus was ‘drag king’ with ‘queer desires,’ claims theology professor | Fox News

Posted on Updated on

A Catholic college theology professor’s claims about Jesus are rather unusual and would be considered blasphemous and heretical to most Christians.

Source: Jesus was ‘drag king’ with ‘queer desires,’ claims theology professor | Fox News

While I must admit the statement made by this professor is unusual and in contrast to most Christian theology, it isn’t too far from the truth of what many of today’s liberal idealists think. Christian faith is the paradox of many a discussion on who Christ really is and whether or not He is the Son of God. However for someone to make such a statement as those by Dr. Tat-siong Benny Liew who heads the New Testament studies at Holy Cross University would have to be badly skewered in their thinking by liberal ideology in order to place God’s Son in a category with the LGBTQ community.

The issue over these statements made almost a decade ago should be whether or not he should be allowed to continue to hold onto his position when such views are only one statement away on a daily basis and exegesis of teaching. What strikes me about this is that he clearly was trying to define Christ in a sexually sensual way that would defer any qualms about transgenderism among the faithful who see him as a progenitor of New Testament truth.

“[Christ] ends up appearing as a drag-kingly bride in his passion,” he argues. “If one follows the trajectory of the Wisdom/Word or Sophia/Jesus (con)figuration, what we have in John’s Jesus is not only a ‘king of Israel’ or ‘king of the Ioudaioi [Jews],’ but also a drag king.” In this statement made by Dr. Liew, we can see that within the atmosphere of the Catholic church there is ample room for audacious scriptural interpretations to occur that not only strike across theological zones but also God laden spiritual boundaries.

John’s gospel in the New Testament is the most sensual of the four, but it is not given to any sexual perversity of mind, He clearly writes about the passion and love Christ has for all who would believe He is the Son of God. Nothing contained in those scriptures reveals the kind of sensual and seductive imagery that Dr. Liew is promoting. His use of Jesus’ crucifixion to somehow justify a description for homosexual bonding taking place between Father and Son should set off alarms warning everyone he is personally cognate of such sexual promiscuity.

Holy Cross representatives distance themselves from such sighted views but continue to uphold him with the declaration that he is a good teacher and man of faith. Something I will disagree with simply because faith isn’t an atonement for spiritual defamation of the one who is at the core of Christianity, and cannot contain any mindedness to afflict on others such a corrupted view. It might be worth remembering that Satan can promote himself as an angel of light in order to be seen as not conflicting to what scripture says about him. 2 Cor 11:14-15 (MSG) 14 And no wonder! Satan does it all the time, dressing up as a beautiful angel of light. 15 So it shouldn’t surprise us when his servants masquerade as servants of God. But they’re not getting by with anything. They’ll pay for it in the end. 

Though Dr. Liew isn’t currently presenting any structured teaching on this doesn’t clear him of any responsibility or accountability concerning the truth about his view of scripture concluding Jesus as a sexually confused male, as he states, if that is what He truly was. The fact that he hasn’t as yet repented of this spiritual error should be a clear statement that he still considers it factual enough to weave it into an ongoing detail he teaches about Jesus Christ the Son of God.

Those who would come to the defense of Dr. Liew are also most likely to defend the devil and his evil mannerisms if it promotes the cause of liberal academics. Any exhorting of such extreme imagination solely for academic freedoms is just an excuse to defame what God has put in place in order to gain personal premises. The sanctioned activity within the confines of liberal arts is today being used by liberals as a platform for relativism as a means to subdue any thought process prone to see naturalism in God’s creation as truth.